<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Look at Cord-Cutting: How Big Is It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi @ Richmond 4G Wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10013</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi @ Richmond 4G Wireless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/?p=437#comment-10013</guid>
		<description>Hi there, just wandered by.  I have a Richmond 4g website.  Lots of information out there.  Not what I was looking for, but nice site.  Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, just wandered by.  I have a Richmond 4g website.  Lots of information out there.  Not what I was looking for, but nice site.  Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/?p=437#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Of course, massive &quot;cord-cutting&quot; isn&#039;t here yet.  

But over the past year or two, all the pieces to allow a massive shift to happen have come into place:  

--widespread availability of much (admittedly, not all) &quot;high value&quot; broadcast content, either for free or &#039;a la carte&#039;; 
--broadband connections fast enough to stream this content in acceptably high resolution (greater than SD if admittedly not 720p/1080p); and
--an explosion of consumer devices that allow such streaming, directly to a real TV, without extensive technical hurdles (i.e., low dork factor) (TiVo, Apple TV, boxee, BluRay players with built in NetFlix streaming).

What was it that caused huge numbers of people under 30 to stop paying for landline service and rely on their cell phone?  Cell phones &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; don&#039;t have the same reliability that land lines do.... And did it happen all at once, in one quarter?  I don&#039;t know, but I don&#039;t think it was that dramatic.

One question regarding your statistics: do they reflect the numbers/percentages/times that respondents watched video &lt;em&gt;on their computer monitors&lt;/em&gt;?  Or do they also include in their numbers video watched on a primary TV that was &lt;em&gt;delivered&lt;/em&gt; over the public internet to a set top box?  Because it is the latter, rather than the former, that I think is the relevant and transformative phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, massive &#8220;cord-cutting&#8221; isn&#8217;t here yet.  </p>
<p>But over the past year or two, all the pieces to allow a massive shift to happen have come into place:  </p>
<p>&#8211;widespread availability of much (admittedly, not all) &#8220;high value&#8221; broadcast content, either for free or &#8216;a la carte&#8217;;<br />
&#8211;broadband connections fast enough to stream this content in acceptably high resolution (greater than SD if admittedly not 720p/1080p); and<br />
&#8211;an explosion of consumer devices that allow such streaming, directly to a real TV, without extensive technical hurdles (i.e., low dork factor) (TiVo, Apple TV, boxee, BluRay players with built in NetFlix streaming).</p>
<p>What was it that caused huge numbers of people under 30 to stop paying for landline service and rely on their cell phone?  Cell phones <em>still</em> don&#8217;t have the same reliability that land lines do&#8230;. And did it happen all at once, in one quarter?  I don&#8217;t know, but I don&#8217;t think it was that dramatic.</p>
<p>One question regarding your statistics: do they reflect the numbers/percentages/times that respondents watched video <em>on their computer monitors</em>?  Or do they also include in their numbers video watched on a primary TV that was <em>delivered</em> over the public internet to a set top box?  Because it is the latter, rather than the former, that I think is the relevant and transformative phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>william Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/?p=437#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>Cutting the cord will happen much quicker than the incumbent reactive cable companies would want you to believe. We have gone from how are we going to get to 500 channels of programming with little content to distribute to the end users to an over abundance of content and a form of distribution that will allow for all this content to be made available to the end users. Techies supported cutting edge satellite technology when introduced leading to a major player in DIRECTV and will continue to support the transition to streaming video to the HD televisions more and more households have in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting the cord will happen much quicker than the incumbent reactive cable companies would want you to believe. We have gone from how are we going to get to 500 channels of programming with little content to distribute to the end users to an over abundance of content and a form of distribution that will allow for all this content to be made available to the end users. Techies supported cutting edge satellite technology when introduced leading to a major player in DIRECTV and will continue to support the transition to streaming video to the HD televisions more and more households have in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Look at Cord-Cutting: No Such Thing as a Free Lunch</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/broadband/2009/05/29/another-look-at-cord-cutting-how-big-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Look at Cord-Cutting: No Such Thing as a Free Lunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/?p=437#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>[...]  &#171; McSlarrow Defends Cable&#8217;s Right to Experiment Another Look at Cord-Cutting: How Big Is It? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  &laquo; McSlarrow Defends Cable&#8217;s Right to Experiment Another Look at Cord-Cutting: How Big Is It? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

