<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the &#8220;neutrality&#8221; debate has evolved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The First Amendment &#38; the Cable Industry: Net Neutrality and the First Amendment &#171; CableTechTalk</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/comment-page-1/#comment-7674</link>
		<dc:creator>The First Amendment &#38; the Cable Industry: Net Neutrality and the First Amendment &#171; CableTechTalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/#comment-7674</guid>
		<description>[...] Google, for example, historically has been a vigorous proponent of net neutrality, and it’s easy to see why.  Google has its own ubiquitous facilities for storing its content at sites near cable facilities across the nation.  Therefore, it can already reach broadband customers faster than other content and application providers.  Prohibiting cable operators and telephone companies from offering enhanced or guaranteed delivery to other content and application providers would not preserve equality.  To the contrary, it would preserve the inequality and head start that Google already enjoys – promoting this very large speaker over others.  Don’t get me wrong:  it sounds like a good business plan; I just don’t think it is the business of government. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google, for example, historically has been a vigorous proponent of net neutrality, and it’s easy to see why.  Google has its own ubiquitous facilities for storing its content at sites near cable facilities across the nation.  Therefore, it can already reach broadband customers faster than other content and application providers.  Prohibiting cable operators and telephone companies from offering enhanced or guaranteed delivery to other content and application providers would not preserve equality.  To the contrary, it would preserve the inequality and head start that Google already enjoys – promoting this very large speaker over others.  Don’t get me wrong:  it sounds like a good business plan; I just don’t think it is the business of government. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Reminder of What &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; Is Really About</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Reminder of What &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; Is Really About</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>[...] than a year ago, I put up a post expressing my pleasure about how the “net neutrality” discussion had evolved over time . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than a year ago, I put up a post expressing my pleasure about how the “net neutrality” discussion had evolved over time . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Genachowski Proposes New Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/comment-page-1/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Genachowski Proposes New Rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-companies/comcast/2008/08/06/how-the-neutrality-debate-has-evolved/#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>[...] we noted on this blog how the &quot;net neutrality&quot; debate has evolved over time. NCTA has consistently supported our customers&#8217; ability to travel the Internet freely; our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we noted on this blog how the &quot;net neutrality&quot; debate has evolved over time. NCTA has consistently supported our customers&#8217; ability to travel the Internet freely; our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

