<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cable Makes Emmy Noms History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Buy the Cow?</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4842</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Buy the Cow?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/#comment-4842</guid>
		<description>[...] Cable was able to build a business appealing to niche audiences, but it required a dual revenue stream, to offset the fact that any one cable network doesn’t generally attract as large an audience as a broadcast network might (Although on occasion, cable programs get broadcast-level ratings, such as here, here and here) . This business model has enabled cable to create quality programming that’s won both accolades and viewers (See this post from 2008). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cable was able to build a business appealing to niche audiences, but it required a dual revenue stream, to offset the fact that any one cable network doesn’t generally attract as large an audience as a broadcast network might (Although on occasion, cable programs get broadcast-level ratings, such as here, here and here) . This business model has enabled cable to create quality programming that’s won both accolades and viewers (See this post from 2008). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cable Continues to Win Ratings Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cable Continues to Win Ratings Battle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>[...] I mentioned this in July, during a discussion of the Emmy nominations,  but it&#8217;s always worth noting that people now turn to cable television very frequently to serve their needs for entertainment and information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mentioned this in July, during a discussion of the Emmy nominations,  but it&#8217;s always worth noting that people now turn to cable television very frequently to serve their needs for entertainment and information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

