Today we are announcing the next step in our industry’s longstanding commitment to use our technologies to improve education in America. We’re proposing a two-year public-private pilot program called Adoption Plus (A+) which could bring broadband to millions of children in low-income households.

Twenty years ago, our industry founded Cable in the Classroom (CIC), which over the past decade has brought free broadband service to thousands of schools and community libraries.

In recent years, our industry has also focused on the digital divide and how to promote broadband adoption.  Cox Communications, for example, has participated in a widely praised program in Santa Barbara, California, in which it provides discounted broadband service to children who participate in the National School Lunch program, together with partners who provide discounted or free computers.

Even though broadband is available to more than 90% of the households in the United States, almost one-third of those households don’t take the service.  Why?  Well, recent studies by the Pew Research Center demonstrate there is no single reason, and some of the multiple reasons – such as understanding the relevance of broadband, digital literacy, computer ownership, and affordability – likely overlap.

Several months ago, with the strong encouragement of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, we started working with the FCC’s broadband team to explore how we might help.  They were critical to helping with the data necessary to determine how to really focus in on a concept that could provide the maximum benefit.  Chairman Genachowski and Blair Levin, Executive Director of the FCC’s Omnibus Broadband Initiative, were very supportive of developing a proposal that would help low-income households that do not currently receive broadband.

The A+ pilot program builds on the experience of Cox Communications’ Santa Barbara initiative, by proposing a two-year, public-private partnership designed to promote sustainable broadband adoption for a vitally important-but-vulnerable population – middle school-aged children in low income households that do not currently receive broadband service.  The program is called Adoption Plus because it is a comprehensive approach that treats broadband adoption as a multi-faceted problem that requires multi-faceted solutions.  Barriers to adoption – e.g., relevance, digital literacy, computer ownership, affordability – are interwoven and cannot be resolved in isolation.

The goal of the A+ program is to help give millions of students the opportunity to become digital citizens of the 21st Century by driving sustainable broadband adoption and positively and materially affecting educational outcomes.

Here is how it would work (a more detailed summary can be found at NCTA’s website):

• A+ would promote the adoption of broadband service to households that do not currently receive it, by offering comprehensive digital media literacy education, discounted computers, and discounted home broadband service to households representing up to 3.5 million American children in grades 6 through 9 who are eligible to receive a free or reduced-cost meal through the National School Lunch Program.
• We propose that school districts administer the program, apply for federal funding, and partner with non-profit corporations promoting digital media literacy, computer manufacturers and/or retailers, and cable and other broadband Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
• Perhaps the most important role of the school districts is to implement digital media literacy programs, including online safety training, and training on how to use computers and broadband.  Including administration costs, we recommend that $100 million of federal funding be used for school districts which apply to set up an A+ program.
• We also anticipate that computer manufacturers would supply discounted computers as partners in A+, but ask the government to consider whether and to what extent federal funding is appropriate to help further discount the cost of computers.
• For each eligible household, participating ISPs would provide free installation of broadband service; a 50 percent discount off the monthly subscription cost of their entry level broadband service; and a 50 percent discount off the cost of modem equipment, whether purchased or rented.
• It is important to note that, while we recommend federal funding for digital media literacy training and administration of this program by school districts, we are not seeking any government funding of the ISPs’ contribution to A+.

While the A+ program is open to other broadband ISPs who wish to participate, so far, all of the cable ISPs represented on NCTA’s Board of Directors have agreed to participate in the A+ program as outlined above.  Those companies also have committed to air public service announcements explaining and promoting local A+ programs.  We estimate the value of the cable ISP contribution to the A+ program, with full student participation, at well over $500 million.

Our industry will continue to creatively harness the power of technology, including broadband, for educational purposes in other ways as well.

For example, A&E Television Networks, through HISTORY, has partnered with more than a dozen major cable operators around the country in creating Take a Veteran to School Day, where veterans are welcomed into local schools for special assemblies and oral history projects – a program that was recognized by President Obama at the White House just a few weeks ago.  And Viacom has partnered with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in the Get Schooled initiative to identify effective approaches to increase high school and college graduation rates, improve post secondary readiness and promote the fundamental importance of education.

With the nation’s new emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, major cable companies have stepped up with new commitments, such as the $100 million Connect a Million Minds initiative launched in November by Time Warner Cable, to introduce young people to opportunities and resources that inspire them to develop the STEM skills that will help solve our economic, environmental, and community challenges of the future. Discovery Communications is supporting STEM education by offering a commercial-free programming block for middle schoolers on the Science Channel, and through Discovery Education, which will provide STEM Connect, a new broadband delivered curriculum-based career development resource helping students link their science, math, engineering and technology education to their future careers. President Obama recently recognized both Time Warner Cable and Discovery in a White House announcement on STEM initiatives.    Earlier this year, Comcast teamed with One Economy to launch the Comcast Digital Connectors program in more than 20 markets nationwide, an initiative designed to teach broadband technologies to young people ages 14-21 from diverse, low-income backgrounds, who then put that knowledge to work in their local communities.

And Cablevision offers teachers important tools for using broadband and interactive technology as part of its Power to Learn program.

There are many other examples of creative initiatives that recognize how broadband can positively affect education of America’s children.  What they have in common is an understanding that partnerships and collaboration among interested stakeholders is required for success.  A+ is an ambitious step forward in this tradition, and we look forward to working with interested government agencies and other stakeholders to make it a reality.

For the next two days Paul and I will be Tweeting, blogging, and otherwise chattering about the annual Personal Democracy Forum (PDF) in NYC. PDF is the premier event for dicsussion of online politics and Cable is a proud sponsor. Cable’s James Assey will be participating on a panel this afternoon focused on the state of US broadband and the Obama Administration’s goals to get every American connected. He’ll share the stage with Josh Silver from Free Press, Hank Hultquist of AT&T, and Blair Levin from the FCC.

PDF explores how we, as a society, are changing the way we interact with issue advocacy and candidate campaigns as well as our governemnt.

If you’re interested, use Twitter Search to follow the discussion.  You can find a full program and schedule for the panels at PersonalDemocracy.com

As we’ve said previously, the cable industry has spent the last few weeks gearing up for today’s culmination of the DTV transition.  And at midday Friday, the transition itself seemed relatively uneventful.  It’s an interesting day in that there’s a “rolling” transition underway, across four time zones.

If you put aside time zones and look just at “dayparts,” here are the number of stations and time of day they told the FCC they would switch off their analog signals:

• midnight to 6:00 a.m. –   186 stations
• 6 a.m. to 12 noon – 239stations
• 12 noon to 6:00 p.m. -  155 stations
• 6 p.m. to midnight – 391 stations

All things considered, the turn-off of analog seems to be going as well as could be hoped. Cable personnel in the field have reported technical issues for about 15 broadcast stations, in markets within states including Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, and West Virginia.

In most of these cases, the issues involved broadcast signals temporarily going off the air – where analog has been turned off but for some reason the digital transmission has failed. We think there has been only a minimal impact on cable subscribers. In some cases, the same broadcast stations are delivering their signals to cable “headends” through a fiber line, so even if there’s a problem with over the air transmission, the station’s signal is still getting to cable subscribers. In cases in which signals have gone down, but where that fiber feed may not be available, cable customers along with over the air viewers have temporarily lost access to those broadcast signals.

Broadcast and cable engineers have been quick to pounce on those problems, however, and most of them have been resolved in a matter of hours.

We’re keeping a close eye on the situation through a contingent of dozens of cable executives at corporate and field-based locations.  Cable execs are trading email updates with an extensive list of colleagues around the country.  Those same people are jumping on conference calls once a day to compare notes.  We are talking regularly with FCC officials, both by email and conference calls.  And we’re regularly exchanging information with our counterparts at trade associations representing broadcasters and consumer electronics manufacturers.

That same regimen will be up and running through the course of the weekend as well, so we’ll continue to post on developments as they occur.  We’d be interested in knowing any of your experiences as well, so please comment away.

When the first group of 600+ over the air stations made the transition from analog to digital broadcast in February, their transition was met with relatively few, and entirely manageable complaints.

In exactly one week, the rest of the nation’s full power, OTA stations will make complete the transition, capping an effort that began many years ago.  The transition has not been without its challenges, but it represents the culmination of a lot of hard work by broadcasters, consumer electronics companies, subscription television services, and government at every level.  Cable, for its part, has contributed hundreds of millions in advertising to educate consumers on about the transition and so they will continue receiving signals next week.

We have also coordinated efforts between cable engineers and MSTV – the group representing broadcast engineers – to limit any technical problems.  That effort began over a year ago and identified issues early on that might have impacted the transition.  When the first stations moved from analog to digital in February, NCTA Science & Technology office  staffed a “war room” to give cable engineers an opportunity to report on activities in the field. We exchanged information with MSTV to address issues as they arose and in virtually all of such cases, the impact on cable carriage of the broadcast signal in question was minimal, with any problems being resolved in a matter of hours.

In addition, as Kyle McSlarrow noted Wednesday in his remarks before the FCC, cable also initially organized the DTV call center operation and contributed significant sums in cash grants to community groups to educate their constituents or assist them.  In addition, we placed tens of thousands of dollars in advertisements to reach at-risk groups with information.

Cable has gone beyond the call to ensure every American, not just our customers, is aware of, and is ready for transition.  We did this because we realize the transition is an important milestone for our country and we want it to be a success.  Our industry has worked tirelessly and with every level of government to guarantee that next week’s switch goes as smoothly as possible.

Should you, or anyone you know have questions or concerns about the switch, call 1-888-CALLFCC (1-888-225-5322).  The DTV hotline will be able to assist you.

Since this has been a busy week, it seemed like a good time to provide an update on the broadband stimulus implementation process. I’ll refer you back to this earlier video from NCTA President & CEO Kyle McSlarrow and our White Paper; we think a strong broadband infrastructure is a good thing and we think the use of grants to promote broadband is a good thing, but we also think the funds ought to be used efficiently and we think the process ought to be fair & transparent.

On Monday, James Assey, Executive Vice President of NCTA, participated in a Roundtable on Nondiscrimination and Interconnection Obligations.

As part of the stimulus package, funding was included to “establish a Broadband Technology Opportunities Program for awards to eligible entities to develop and expand broadband services to rural and underserved areas and improve access to broadband by public safety agencies.” NTIA and RUS, the agencies that are implementing BTOP, are holding a series of public meetings, and Monday’s event was part of this. In broad terms, “Nondiscrimination and Interconnection Obligations” refers to how networks interact with each other and exchange traffic.

That’s a whole lot of background to set-up the statement that Assey delivered, which can be accessed on our website, along with a summary.

On Tuesday, NCTA Associate General Counsel Steve Morris spoke on a panel at another public meeting. Andrew Feinberg at BroadbandCensus.com provided coverage:

The statutory guidelines provide a good start in determining standards, said Morris. Morris invoked President Obama’s call for a transparent process, and said it be governed by a merit-based system of seven objective measurements to be shared between NTIA and RUS.

Job creation and preservation should be first and foremost among the selection criteria, Morris said. Preference should also be given to those applicants that can complete build-out within the statutory time periods, and that are able to maintain projects afterwards.

Infrastructure should be built out first the “last mile,” Morris said. And programs that target schools, libraries, and other “public interest” institutions should be ranked ahead of those that don’t, he added. Further considerations could be cost per capita and relative expense compared to other forms of communication, he said.

On Wednesday, NCTA responded to a Request for Comments on the FCC Report On Rural Broadband Strategy; those comments can also be found on our website. Essentially, we called for complete interagency communication and coordination; transparency; a set of coherent and clearly defined goals; an update of the FCC’s universal service and pole attachment policies; and an initial focus on extending broadband facilities to unserved areas and underserved populations.

Also this week, Representatives Joe Barton [R, TX-6] and Cliff Stern [R, FL-6] sent a letter to NTIA, RUS and the FCC about the broadband stimulus funds. You should read the letter, but some of the key points are:

• Stimulus funds should go where broadband mapping has been completed
• Funding should go to the unserved over the underserved
• We should stimulate demand rather than supply
• These efforts should be technologically & competitively neutral
• We should fund economically efficient projects

Today, we started trucking equipment over to the Washington Convention Center here in D.C. A crew will start setting up our Broadband Nation exhibit over the weekend (see this previous post).

Broadband Nation is our 20,000-square-foot interactive exhibit at The Cable Show.  This exhibit will demonstrate the many ways in which broadband technology has changed the way Americans live, work and play.  It’s a hands-on opportunity to experience a wide variety of innovative new technology products and services available both now and possibly in the future for the home, school, and office, as well as specialized applications for medical centers, schools, and retail and entertainment outlets, among others. Broadband Nation seeks to capture in tangible ways how broadband has, and will, alter the everyday life of Americans; the exhibit will provide a good rationale for the broadband stimulus funding.

Next week, there will also be a couple sessions at The Cable Show that will focus on this issue.

• Wednesday, April 01, from 3:00 – 4:15 p.m., the session “21st Century Communications Policy: The Role of the States” will feature a conversation with State Public Utility Commissioners examining (like it says in the title) the states’ role in this process.
• Friday, April 03, from 11:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m., the session “If We Build It, Will They Log On: Barriers to Broadband Adoption and Use” will look at how to drive adoption of broadband applications within the medical, education, safety and environmental/energy sectors.