<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CableTechTalk &#187; Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tag/convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cable Continues to Win Ratings Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/08/27/cable-continues-to-win-ratings-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/08/27/cable-continues-to-win-ratings-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rodriguez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/08/27/cable-continues-to-win-ratings-battle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the heavy coverage of the Democratic Convention in Denver, I&#8217;ve read a few stories that talk about how viewership of the event is off. For example, there is a chart in the Washington Post today entitled &#8220;TV Ratings Drop.&#8221; But they mean &#8220;network television ratings,&#8221; by which they mean ABC, NBC, CBS.  But that&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the heavy coverage of the Democratic Convention in Denver, I&#8217;ve read a few stories that talk about how viewership of the event is off.</p>
<p>For example, there is a chart in the <em>Washington Post</em> today entitled &#8220;TV Ratings Drop.&#8221; But they mean &#8220;network television ratings,&#8221; by which they mean ABC, NBC, CBS.  But that&#8217;s completely the wrong metric.  In addition to the Big Three and PBS, you can watch convention coverage on C-SPAN, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and even BET and TV One.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the story in <em>TV Week</em>: <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/08/cable_news_networks_reap_polit.php">Cable News Networks Reap Political Ratings</a>. In <em>B&amp;C</em>: <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA440030.html">Cable Adds Viewers on Day Two</a>. <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j20j35FyI2MJp2ge07t7q4sG7tGgD92QA6VO0">This AP story</a> notes that CNN beat ABC and CBS during the broadcast of Michelle Obama&#8217;s speech during the 10:00 p.m. slot. And cable news viewership was way up over 2004, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/26/first-night-democratic-convention-ratings-way-up-over-2004/4788">according to TV by the Numbers</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/07/17/cable-makes-emmy-noms-history/">I mentioned this in July</a>, during a discussion of the Emmy nominations,  but it&#8217;s always worth noting that people now turn to cable television very frequently to serve their needs for entertainment and information.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/cable-programming/2008/08/27/cable-continues-to-win-ratings-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

