<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CableTechTalk &#187; Kevin Delaney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tag/kevin-delaney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Malik, Bennett, Google and Yahoo, Oh My!</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/07/09/malik-bennett-google-and-yahoo-oh-my/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/07/09/malik-bennett-google-and-yahoo-oh-my/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Delaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/07/09/malik-bennett-google-and-yahoo-oh-my/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech blogger Om Malik does some really good work covering the telecom/technology space. If he&#8217;s not on your reading list, he should be. I don&#8217;t always agree with him, but he brings some interesting perspective to coverage of this space. Today he has an interesting look at two complementary articles on Google and its advertising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech blogger Om Malik does some really good work covering the telecom/technology space.  If he&#8217;s not on your reading list, he should be.  I don&#8217;t always agree with him, but he brings some interesting perspective to coverage of this space.</p>
<p>Today he has an interesting look at two complementary articles on Google and its advertising future &#8211; the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121557163349038289.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em>&#8216;s Kevin Delaney</a> offers the first and <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/08/EDBH11LNQS.DTL">Richard Bennett, in the <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em></a>, provides the second.</p>
<p>Malik wonders if the <em>WSJ</em> article is intended to draw sympathy for Google as it tries to grab at the brass ring with the Yahoo deal.</p>
<blockquote><p>If anything, the [Delaney] article paints a rather sympathetic view of Google and its money machine. I am surprised by the timing of this story. After all, these problems are quite well known and have been subject of many tomes.</p>
<p>I wonder if this story and Google’s challenges are meant to portray the search-and-online advertising giant as an underdog and win it some sympathy from regulators as it goes in to get its advertising deal with Yahoo approved.</p></blockquote>
<p>Malik links to Bennett&#8217;s column which suggests that Google&#8217;s renewed interest in net neutrality (a concept it had begun to walk away from, until <a href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/news-items/2008/07/05/despite-good-news-about-broadband-adoption-vint-cerf-calls-for-nationalization-sort-of-maybe-a-little-bit/">Cerf&#8217;s recent comments implying a preference for nationalization</a>) may be an effort at drawing attention away from the Google-Yahoo deal.</p>
<blockquote><p>Nearing an agreement with Yahoo to grab the ailing company&#8217;s search business, Google scripted a series of dramatic public events apparently designed to distract from the pending deal. These events emphasize network neutrality, an ever-changing regulatory ideal that Google thrust into the political spotlight two years ago. As entertaining as this spectacle is, regulators should not be fooled.</p></blockquote>
<p>In his exploration of Google&#8217;s Net neutrality efforts and the timing, Bennett charges that there is a certain amount of doublespeak going on.  While highlighting Google&#8217;s argument that net neutrality is necessary because there are only a few competitors in broadband provision, Bennett points out that the Google-Yahoo deal would give the Big-G 85% of the market for search ads, and the ability to set prices with no competitive controls.</p>
<p>I think both articles are interesting reads, and thank Om for pointing them out.  Malik also has a poll up on his site asking readers to weigh in on whether the Google-Yahoo deal should go through.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/07/09/malik-bennett-google-and-yahoo-oh-my/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

