We’re still about a week away from the summer solstice, but it sure feels like summer already. The massive heatwave in Washington, D.C. this week helped set the tone, but the available programming on broadcast television also contributes.

It’s no secret that cable programming has been doing very well in recent years, especially as compared to broadcast television. Just one example is the growing number of honors that cable has won over the years.

Lost, The Big Bang Theory and The Office have gone bye-bye for a while and instead we can look forward to I Survived A Japanese Game Show and Dance Machine. But one way to make it through the summer TV doldrums is to turn to cable television. I am reminded of this by two items from this week. On Monday, the NY Times‘ David Carr pointed out it’s a Golden Age for TV? Yes, on Cable. Yesterday, Hamilton Nolan noted on Gawker: Cable: The Old New Big Thing.

Carr said this:

However, for anybody with cable — and that includes most of us — television is in something of a golden age. Cable networks other than the fancy subscription services like HBO and Showtime used to be the realm of stupid human tricks and commercials for six-minute abs, but networks have shot by them in the race to the bottom.

Channels like TNT, AMC, FX and others came up with their own versions of “Trading Places” and carved out niches, sometimes huge ones, by letting viewers know that narrative, quality and drama have not gone off the grid.

And Hamilton said this:

Networks must, by design, try for mass appeal. Cable channels can target their audiences much more effectively. The scary thing for networks is that even specialized cable channels no longer represent just a niche audience any more; they are almost as plugged into the mainstream as the networks themselves.

The success of cable is built on serving niches. As Carr said, those niches can get collectively pretty big.

The Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau has a handy chart on its website showing the effect of summer: Ad-Supported Cable Viewing Shares Heat Up In The Summertime. It looks at all dayparts, but if we examine just one metric, we see that primetime ratings for ad-supported cable networks increased 17% from November ‘06 to July ‘07, while broadcast ratings went down 33% for that same time period.

It’s worth revisiting a topic that never goes off the radar: Concern about content. Everybody can agree that cable transformed the television landscape by vastly expanding viewing choices, but not every viewing option is to everybody’s taste.

But the important point to remember that what cable delivers is choice. You get a ton of options and then you pick out the ones that appeal to you. Spouses, partners, kids, friends and neighbors all are likely to make different choices. But by starting with a wide initial set of options, everybody can have a better chance of being satisfied.

Some people are very concerned about certain programs. This is very understandable, because not all programming is appropriate for all ages. Some content may not be to your taste or may even offend you. Fortunately, there is a solution: parental control features.

You can find out more at our website Control Your TV or from a report prepared by the Progress & Freedom Foundation’s Adam Thierer. Suffice it to say that between your television’s V-chip controls and those of cable’s digital set-top boxes, you have the ability to block by channel, rating or show. (Also, read this chronology to see how long the cable industry has been addressing this issue.)

Philosophical argument #1: I don’t like a piece of content, so it ought to be stopped. The problem with this approach is that what’s a problem for you may not be a problem for me and vice versa. The best solution is not to ban, but to allow me to choose that content and allow you to block it out.

Philosophical argument #2: That piece of content is so offensive that it’s wrong that I’m “forced to subsidize it” with my cable subscription. Currently, the best and most economically efficient way to deliver a broad array of viewing options is through bundles of channels. You may feel like you’re “subsidizing” the channels you don’t watch, but your fellow subscribers who don’t watch your favorites may be “subsidizing” yours. There is plenty of evidence to show that a mandatory a la carte system would lead to fewer viewing options, less diversity of content, and higher prices overall.