<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Big Thing: The Future of Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Telecommunications Policy Discussion</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does A La Carte Always Make Sense?</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does A La Carte Always Make Sense?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>[...] I just noticed that this January post during CES touches on many of these same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just noticed that this January post during CES touches on many of these same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking on a la carte</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking on a la carte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] came up last week when NCTA&#8217;s Kyle McSlarrow was on a panel; it comes up all the time. Steve Jobs just gave his yearly Sermon on the Mount (a.k.a, his Macworld [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came up last week when NCTA&#8217;s Kyle McSlarrow was on a panel; it comes up all the time. Steve Jobs just gave his yearly Sermon on the Mount (a.k.a, his Macworld [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PC, TV &#38; Cable</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>CableTechTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PC, TV &#38; Cable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] different strategies for video distribution; for example, they are a backer of Hulu, a project mentioned in a panel Monday. In December, NBC announced a deal with SanDisk to distribute content through the Fanfare service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different strategies for video distribution; for example, they are a backer of Hulu, a project mentioned in a panel Monday. In December, NBC announced a deal with SanDisk to distribute content through the Fanfare service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>You want to choose what you watch?  In a world with hundreds of digital channels, streaming and downloadable video, VOD, and DVRs, I'd say viewers have lots of choice and control.

Oh, wait.  Maybe what you mean is that you want to be able to choose the channels you &lt;em&gt;receive&lt;/em&gt;, which is a different issue.  Take a look at that Nocera column, because he lays the whole thing out.  It's a complicated issue, but the bottom line is that a bundle of offerings gives the most value.

Would it be great to get exactly what you want and pay less than you do now?  You bet.  Is that going to happen?  No.

I believe Patrick Norton made &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; points.  He wants all video content to be available on the Internet.  Again, a laudable goal, but that is largely tied to licensing agreements and is controlled to a certain extent by rights holders.

His second point was the one about a la carte for cable.  There are plenty of studies - &lt;a href="http://www.ncta.com/PublicationType/MiscellaneousPublication/3182.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;which you can find here&lt;/a&gt; - which conclude that a la carte raise the cost for consumers, reduce the number of choices, and decrease the diversity that can be found today in cable programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to choose what you watch?  In a world with hundreds of digital channels, streaming and downloadable video, VOD, and DVRs, I&#8217;d say viewers have lots of choice and control.</p>
<p>Oh, wait.  Maybe what you mean is that you want to be able to choose the channels you <em>receive</em>, which is a different issue.  Take a look at that Nocera column, because he lays the whole thing out.  It&#8217;s a complicated issue, but the bottom line is that a bundle of offerings gives the most value.</p>
<p>Would it be great to get exactly what you want and pay less than you do now?  You bet.  Is that going to happen?  No.</p>
<p>I believe Patrick Norton made <em>two</em> points.  He wants all video content to be available on the Internet.  Again, a laudable goal, but that is largely tied to licensing agreements and is controlled to a certain extent by rights holders.</p>
<p>His second point was the one about a la carte for cable.  There are plenty of studies - <a href="http://www.ncta.com/PublicationType/MiscellaneousPublication/3182.aspx" rel="nofollow">which you can find here</a> - which conclude that a la carte raise the cost for consumers, reduce the number of choices, and decrease the diversity that can be found today in cable programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzie</title>
		<link>http://www.cabletechtalk.com/tech-discussions/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cabletechtalk.com/2008/01/08/next-big-thing-the-future-of-television/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Why can't I choose what I want to watch, be it network TV shows or internet shows!  And why do the greedy cable companies say you have to pay extra if you want it your way!  I'm with Patrick on this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t I choose what I want to watch, be it network TV shows or internet shows!  And why do the greedy cable companies say you have to pay extra if you want it your way!  I&#8217;m with Patrick on this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
